|
DISTRIBUTION OF CORPORATE CAPITAL GAINS
IMAGINATIVE USE OF LIFE INSURANCE SAVES AN ESTATE PLAN
DEATH IN THE FAMILY? WHAT DO I DO NOW?
TAX FAIRNESS
LOANS TO SHAREHOLDERS
PREPARING A LOAN PROPOSAL
INCORPORATION OF A PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
PERSONAL TAX PLANNING
DISTRIBUTION OF CORPORATE CAPITAL GAINS
By John G. Patte, Chartered
Accountant
Capital gains of an individual receive preferential tax treatment - only 50% of the capital gain is taxable. A high income individual taxable on salaries and interest income at a marginal rate of 46% would pay tax on capital gains at only 23%. For a capital gain realized in a corporation, the rules are more complicated, but they insure that the same preferential treatment is retained.
The corporation pays tax on only 50% of the capital gain. Part of that tax, is refundable when the corporation pays taxable dividends to shareholders. The rules insure that the combined tax of the corporation and the individual approximates the tax that the shareholder would have paid if the capital gain were received without the intervention of the corporation.
What happens to the 50% of the capital gain that was not taxable? How can this amount be distributed without attracting additional tax? The non-taxed 50% is added to a special tax account called the capital dividend account or CDA. By filing a special election under subsection 83(2) of the Income Tax Act, the balance in the CDA can be distributed to shareholders tax free thereby retaining the same outcome that the individual would have achieved if the capital gain were received directly.
Problems can arise with the computation and distribution of the CDA. First, there can be doubt whether a gain is a capital gain or business income. Consider the profit that a construction company realizes on sale of an apartment building that it constructed and has rented for several years. Canada Customs & Revenue Agency may argue that the profit is ordinary business income because the corporation's regular business is related to the property on which the profit was realized. If the company is unsuccessful in defending the capital gain and has distributed the 50% under a CDA election, the company could have inadvertently incurred a penalty for an excessive election.
Secondly, the calculation of the CDA is cumulative and is reduced by capital losses. If the corporation realizes a $100 capital gain on Monday (CDA addition $50) and a $100 capital loss on Wednesday (CDA reduction $50), there would be no CDA to distribute. Had the company made a CDA election to distribute $50 on Tuesday before the capital loss was realized, then the election would have been valid and no penalties would have arisen.
The rules are complex - if you believe they may apply to you, call me before making a CDA distribution.
IMAGINATIVE USE OF LIFE INSURANCE SAVES AN ESTATE
PLAN
By John G. Patte, Chartered
Accountant
The following hypothetical but realistic
case describes an estate plan for a high income individual, called Frank, who
stands to benefit from an imaginative use of life insurance.
Frank was a widower with four children,
one of whom was becoming a key contributor to Frank's very successful business.
Frank had accumulated what appeared to be a substantial estate -- real estate,
RRSPs, $100,000 in GICs and of course his business. Frank was also a man of
strong views and strong values. While he wanted to be fair to his children, he
did not think that meant that he had to treat them equally. Frank wanted the
business to pass entirely to the one son actively contributing to its success.
He also planned a large bequest to his favourite charity. The remainder of his
estate was to be divided among his other three children. His rough calculations
satisfied him that the distribution to these three children would be
fair.
But Frank failed to consider income taxes
on his death. The income taxes related to the accrued gains in the value of his
business and to his RRSPs. The $100,000 in GICs would be used up paying taxes
leaving nothing for the charity and other children. Frank was unwilling to
accept this result or to change how his hard-earned assets would be distributed.
Obviously, his accountant and other financial advisors had to come up with some
other ideas.
First, an "estate freeze" was undertaken
to "freeze" the value of Frank's business at today's value. Any future increase
in value would accrue to the son who was the intended beneficiary. At least
there would be no further increase in the amount of death taxes. The "freeze"
was done in a way that locked in Frank's $500,000 unused capital gains
exemption. No longer would he live in fear that a future government would repeal
the exemption.
Frank's insurance agent suggested using
the $100,000 in GICs to purchase a prescribed annuity that would provide
payments totalling $8,196 per year before taxes. After taxes of $2,219, Frank
would be left with $5,977. That compared well with what he was receiving on his
GICs -- about $7,000 before tax -- $3,500 after tax. Next, Frank purchased a
$100,000 insurance policy payable to Frank's estate to replace the $100,000
invested in the annuity. The insurance premium of $942 still left Frank ahead by
$1,535 compared to his present situation.
Finally, Frank used the additional cash
flow to buy an insurance policy on Frank's life for the benefit of the charity.
A premium of $1,535 would buy a policy with a death benefit of $166,000 payable
to the charity on Frank's death. Furthermore, because of the way that this
policy was set up, the premiums of $1,535 are considered charitable donations
eligible for a tax credit of about $770.
Frank's situation has been summarized
below:
| |
Before |
After |
| Cash flow during Frank's lifetime
|
|
|
| Cash receipts: |
|
|
| Interest on GIC |
$7,000 |
|
| Annuity receipts |
|
$8,196 |
| |
|
|
| Cash disbursements: |
|
|
| Insurance premiums |
|
(2,477) |
| Income taxes |
(3,500) |
(2,219) |
| Income tax reduction from charitable
donation |
|
770 |
| |
|
| After-tax cash position |
$3,500 |
$4,270 |
| |
|
| Funds available at death |
|
|
| GIC |
$100,000 |
|
| Insurance proceeds |
|
$266,000 |
| |
|
Frank's cash flow actually increased
during his lifetime while the funds available on Frank's death more than
doubled. Thanks to an imaginative use of life insurance, Frank's estate plan now
will succeed.
DEATH IN THE FAMILY? WHAT DO I DO
NOW?
A. You will need the following
information
· Name, home address and telephone numbers
· How long at present address
· Name of business or employer's address
and telephone number
· Occupation and title
· Social insurance number
· Military service serial number
· Date of Birth
· Place of birth
· Citizenship
· Father's name
· Father's birthplace
· Mother's
maiden name
· Mother's birthplace
· Religious name (if any)
B. You may have to pay the following
expenses - if not prepaid or otherwise provided for
· Cemetery property
· Memorials
·
Funeral arrangements
· Final medical expenses possibly including doctors,
nurses, hospitals and ambulance, medicine and drugs Other urgent and current
bills (mortgage or rent, taxes, installment payments)
· Interment service,
including:
o Clergy
o Florist
o Clothing
o Transportation
o
Telephone and telegraph
o Food and accommodation
C. In due course, you may need certain
documents to establish your right to act as executor and deal with the
deceased's property or to establish the beneficiaries' rights to insurance,
pensions and similar benefits:
· Will
· Legal proof of age or birth
certificate
· Social insurance number
· Marriage license
·
Citizenship papers
· Insurance policies (life, health, automobile, property)
· Bank books
· Deeds to property
· Bill of sale of car
· Income
tax returns, receipts or cancelled cheques
· Military discharge certificate
· Disability claims
· Cemetery certificate of ownership
D. Certain matters must be decided and
arranged within a few hours:
· Cemetery lot location and which space to
open
· Memorial type and inscription
· Casket type
· Clothing for
deceased
· Vault or sectional crypt
· Type of service (religious,
military, fraternal)
· Special selection from scriptures
· Clergy to
officiate
· Select funeral home
· Place where service is to be held
·
Time of funeral service
· Charitable organization(s) to which donations are
suggested in memory of deceased
· Information for eulogy
· Select
pall-bearers
· Flowers
· Music
· Clothing for you and children
·
Preparation at home, including food for family and guests
· Extra chairs
·
Transportation for family and guests, including planning funeral car list
·
Check and sign necessary papers for burial permit
· Provide vital statistics
about deceased to newspapers
· Provide address and telephone numbers for all
interested people
· Answer sympathetic phone calls, messages, wires and
letters
· Talk with funeral director, cemetery representative, clergy, about
details
· Greet friends and relatives who call
· Arrange for meeting
relatives who arrive from out of town
· Provide lodging for out-of-town
relatives
· Make list of callers and floral tributes for mailing cards of
thanks
· Arrange for special religious services
· Check will regarding
special wishes
· Order death certificate
· Look after minor
children
With the stress and emotion of the death
of a family member, arranging these details can be both a comfort, taking your
mind away from your loss, and a new source of stress that you really don't need.
Suggestion: don't try to do everything yourself. Other family members, friends,
neighbours, the funeral director, clergy - all of these can be of great
assistance at your time of need. They want to help - let them!
E. Notify As Soon As
Possible
· Doctor
· Funeral director
·
Cemetery
· Relatives
· Friends
· Employer of deceased
· Employers of
relatives not going to work
· Pallbearers
· Insurance agents (life, health
and accident)
· Religious, fraternal, civic, veterans organizations,
unions
· Newspapers regarding notices
· Lawyer, Accountant and
Executor
by John G. Patte, C.A.
Under the so-called "Fairness Package", Canada
Customs & Revenue Agency may waive interest and penalties assessed against a
taxpayer in circumstances that Canada Customs & Revenue Agency believes
unfair.
The Fairness Package applies where interest or
penalties have been correctly assessed. Taxpayers are at the mercy of CCRA: no
matter how unfair an assessment may seem to the taxpayer, the taxpayer has no
power to force CCRA to waive interest and penalties. The situations that CCRA
will consider are generally those that arose in circumstances beyond the
taxpayer's control.
Some situations where CCRA has waived interest and
penalties follow:
1. Late penalty for non-resident withholding tax - late
remittance due to clerical error; late filing was not due to intention,
carelessness or negligence and the taxpayer otherwise had a spotless
record.
2. Late penalty and interest for child's tax return - late filed
because of confusion between mother and trustees where funds were left in trust
for a child.
3. Interest assessed where CCRA took more than a year to process
a taxpayer-initiated adjustment for additional income.
4. Late penalty and
interest on a trust return - late filed because of dispute among beneficiaries
that resulted in the freezing of the assets of the trust and prevented the
trustee from obtaining information to file the trust return.
5. Late penalty
on late remittance of employee source deductions - late filing resulted from a
bitter marital dispute in which the divorcing couple, who were the owners and
managers of the corporate employer, did not remit source deductions because of
their animosity and various court decisions.
6. Penalties and interest on a
late filed GST remittance - late filing resulted from CCRA incorrectly advising
the taxpayer that GST did not apply on a transaction between related
parties.
7. Interest on additional assessment - CCRA took two years to carry
out a valuation that was needed for an assessment.
Should you be assessed interest or penalties in a
situation that seems unfair, you should refer to CCRA's Information Circulars
92-1 and 92-2 and consider appealing under the Fairness Package.
Or - you can call us for help!
by John G. Patte,
C.A.
Small business shareholders are notorious for using their company's bank
account as their own. Canada Customs & Revenue Agency is sensitive to the
small business owner's attempts to benefit by causing his corporation to lend
funds to him for personal needs rather than take the same amount as income,
either salary or dividend. Similarly, paying personal expenses of the
shareholder through the corporation, even if they are charged to the
shareholder's loan account, may attract CCRA's attention.
The
Income Tax Act includes two provisions intended to insure that owners pay tax on
the benefits derived from shareholder loans. The first rule is that, if the loan
is not repaid "within one year from the end of the taxation year of the lender
... in which [the loan] was made", the principal amount of the loan is added to
the shareholder's income. This is an onerous provision considering that a salary
of the same amount would have at least been deductible to the company; the loan
is not.
The
second rule is that a taxable benefit must be added to the shareholder's income
if the company fails to charge the shareholder interest on the indebtedness at a
rate at least equal the CCRA's prescribed rate. This rate is adjusted quarterly
and is presently 3% (January to March, 2004).
CCRA's assessing policy has generally emphasized the shareholder loan
rule and ignored the shareholder interest benefit. After all, if CCRA could tax
the full amount of the loan, there was considerably more tax at stake than just
taxing the interest on the loan.
In
most cases, CCRA has ignored shareholder loans as long as there was a credit
balance at the fiscal year end. Generally, management bonuses or dividends are
declared at the end of the taxation year to clear off the indebtedness that has
built up during the year. Where the repayment is merely part of a series of
loans and repayments, no bona vide repayment is considered to have occurred. Of
particular concern was CCRA's position that a running loan balance was a series
of loans and repayments.
CCRA's view of what constitutes a series of loans and repayments was
tested in the Tax Court of Canada in two cases (Attis and Uphill Holdings) in
which the taxpayers argued that the loans had indeed been repaid within one year
through the payment of dividends and bonuses within the one year time limit and
that this procedure was not a "series" for the shareholder loan rules. In both
cases, the taxpayers were successful.
Apparently, CCRA was listening. A change in assessing practices was
announced at the 1994 conference of the Canadian Tax Foundation. Running loan
balances will not automatically be viewed as a series of loans and repayments
based on factors determined by jurisprudence. And payments will be applied on a
"first in, first out" basis , unless facts clearly indicate otherwise. This
position has been interpreted as meaning that CCRA will accept the procedure of
repaying indebtedness with year end dividends and bonuses.
But
we should expect a change in emphasis. While the shareholder loan rules may be
of somewhat less concern if there is at least no debit balance at year end, we
should expect CCRA to look closer at the interest benefit rules where no or
insufficient interest has been charged on the indebtedness.
Knowing that a dividend or bonus will be declared at the fiscal year end
of the company to eliminate that shareholder loans, owners should consider
declaring the dividend or bonus at the beginning of the calendar year each year.
The proceeds could then be applied against the shareholder loan account at the
beginning of the year to allow the shareholder to draw against it for the
remainder of the year. That is, ideally the loan account would never be in debit
balance and there would never be a balance on which to compute an interest
benefit.
PREPARING A LOAN PROPOSAL
by John G. Patte, C.A.
Whether the economy is strong or
faltering, entrepreneurs always seem to find new opportunities to pursue. Taking
advantage of those opportunities may depend in part on arranging financing. This
article deals with some of the elements that go into a good financing
proposal.
A lender's judgment concerning you and
whether he will lend you the funds that you request depends on your personal
credibility. Needless to say, if you go unprepared to your interview with the
lender, his/her judgment will be tainted negatively. So, to avoid starting out
on the wrong foot, here are the suggested elements of a professional and
businesslike financing proposal.
Plan outline
Using a brief covering
letter, outline the basic plan. The outline should include why you need the
financing, how much you need and the benefits to the business from the loan
arrangement. Where the financing is related to a problem such as cash shortage,
potential lenders will not be interested in proposals intended to merely delay
or defer the problem -- lenders will want to know how the loan will solve the
problem.
Describe the nature of the business or the
planned expansion, the specific assets to be purchased and the timing of the
acquisition. Not just the capital investment should be addressed. New businesses
and expanding existing businesses need working capital - cash for current
operations, to purchase inventory and to pay expenses until accounts receivable
are collected.
Types of financing
You should seek the
type of financing that matches your needs. Short-term loans are generally
suitable for short-term financing needs related to working capital. For
instance, the normal business cycle will involve the build up of inventory at
the beginning of the cycle and higher than normal accounts receivable in
mid-cycle. Your capacity to take advantage of these opportunities will be
severely limited if you do not have financing in place. However, these operating
needs will reduce as you receive payments on the receivables in the latter part
of the cycle. Commercial bankers are familiar with such needs and will generally
recommend short-term financing in the form of a line of credit or demand loan,
usually secured by a charge on the accounts receivable and inventory.
Medium-term financing is more suitable to
the capital requirements for the expansion of a business or the purchase of
equipment and leasehold improvements. Typically, a term loan will involve the
repayment of the loan in monthly instalments of principal and interest over one
to five years. A lender understandably will be reluctant to extend the loan term
for a period beyond the useful life of the assets since wear and tear and
obsolescence, as the case may be, will make the collateral worth less than the
loan balance. In some cases, government guarantees may be available under the
Small Business Loans Act.
Longer term financing will generally be
advisable for high value, long-term assets such as land and buildings and may
extend from five to 25 years. Such loans will usually take the form of a
mortgage, i.e., a charge on the specific assets.
Documentation
You should anticipate the
need to document your proposal with the following:
1. A resume of the
business -- i.e., a brief history of your business;
2. A resume of the
owner;
3. Financial information, with emphasis on the ability to repay the
loan. Financial information will include a copy of the financial statements for
the most recently completed period, a forecast of the future operations and a
cash flow projection. A pro forma balance sheet is frequently required giving
effect to the loan and asset purchase, etc. Cash flow projections are frequently
needed on a month by month basis, particularly where the business is cyclical
and cash flow varies over the year. The assumptions underlying the forecasts
should be described. These forecasts and cash flows should also prove to be
useful tools to help you manage your business.
4. Personal net worth
statement -- Lenders frequently require personal guarantees in addition to the
security of the business assets.
5. Details of security -- A lender will want
a detailed descriptions of the security, including an aged accounts receivable
listing, details of inventory and fixed assets.
We can help you make the best possible
presentation - call us.
INCORPORATION OF A PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
by John G. Patte, C.A.
Ontario
professionals may now incorporate and benefit from the same tax rules as apply
to other small businesses. Each professional association has amended its
regulations and set out rules and procedures related to professional
incorporation. Now, the professional must decide whether or not it is in their
best interests to incorporate their professional practice. Each professional
must review his or her own situation to determine whether they personally can
benefit from incorporation and whether they are prepared to deal with the
greater complexity and cost of operating that a corporation may imply. To assist
in that determination, I have set out below some of the possible benefits and
disadvantages of professional incorporation.
Advantages of professional
incorporation
The following are
a few reasons why at least some professionals may find incorporation
attractive:
1. repayment
of debt from less expensive funds
a professional practice,
like other types of business, often faces a substantial cost to start or
purchase a business and to fund various capital investments in the course of
operating the business. If these costs are funded internally (i.e., from
existing cash resources), then the owner's tax paid capital becomes tied up
indefinitely in his business. If the costs are funded through external
borrowings, the debt must be repaid with after-tax funds. In either case, the
owner of an unincorporated business may have a difficult time replacing his
capital or repaying the debt because of his high tax rate. To generate $10,000
in after tax cash - or to make a $10,000 payment on the debt principal - a
professional in the top tax bracket must earn about $18,660 at a marginal tax
cost of 46.4% (income of $18,660 less income tax of $8,660). However, if the
same debt were in a professional corporation, taxable at a rate of only about
18.62%, it would take income of only about $12,288 to generate the after tax
cash of $10,000 to repay the debt or replace the capital (income of $12,288 less
income tax of $2,288). The difference in tax - $6,372 - is available to repay
corporate debt, including amounts due to the
shareholder/professional
One of the debts that a
corporation may have is one owing to the owner himself. The transfer of a
professional practice to a corporation may create a debt owing to the
professional. (The amount owing to the professional will vary from case to case.
However, in general the amount will be equal to the excess of the tax cost of
the assets transferred to the corporation over any loans or other debt assumed
by the corporation.) This debt represents tax-paid funds and can be repaid to
the professional free of any income taxes. Therefore, transferring the business
to the corporation can allow the professional to use the "excess" cash resulting
from the lower corporate tax rates to extract virtually all his capital
investment from the corporation on a tax-free
basis.
2. tax
deferral
for those professionals who
require all of their income to "make ends meet", there will be no tax deferral
benefit. However, for those who can afford not to draw all of the funds
generated by their professional corporation, the benefits can be
substantial.
Many professionals are
capable of generating substantial income from their professional activities.
While initially, the professional's objective may be to increase income and cash
flow, over time the professional's objective will probably change to a greater
emphasis on increasing net worth. Over time, a high income professional should
be able to accumulate a substantial net worth. A major drawback in the past has
been taxes - very high taxes on those high incomes leaves a much more modest
after tax income available for personal consumption and savings.
Let us assume that a
professional earns annually, say, $10,000 more than he needs to meet his
day-to-day standard of living. If that income were received and taxed
personally, the professional would retain only about $5,360 after taxes (again
assuming a marginal tax rate of 46.4%).
However, if that income were
left in a professional corporation and taxed at normal small business corporate
tax rates, his corporation would have about $8,138 after tax. That is, he would
retain after tax about $2,778 more out of the original $10,000 of before tax
income.
Over ten years, ignoring the
income that could be earned on the savings, the professional corporation will
have accumulated about $81,380. While it is possible that, without the
corporation, the professional might have accumulated about $53,600 after tax
(and ignoring income earned on the savings), it is more likely that this amount
would have been spent on additional lifestyle costs and would not have been
saved at all. Without a disciplined and structured saving and investing plan,
the after tax "savings" would probably be dissipated and little would be saved.
Therefore, not only does the corporation offer the possibility of greater after
tax savings, it may also offer a structure that may increase the probability
that there will be savings!
There is a possible obstacle
to this plan: there is a question of whether a professional corporation can
accumulate substantial savings and long-term investments. This matter should of
course be confirmed or a legal interpretation sought. It may be that ordinary
portfolio investments may be allowable while longer term investments, such as
real estate (other than that directly used in the professional practice) would
not be an allowable investment for a professional
corporation.
3. capital
gains exemption
for professionals
concerned about tax on capital gains when they sell their practice - or on death
- incorporation is worth considering.
The sale of an
unincorporated professional practice will often generate additional income and
related income tax on the sale of goodwill and depreciable assets.
The sale of the
shares of a professional corporation, on the other hand, may be completely
exempt from income taxes if the corporation is considered to be a "qualified
small business corporation". While there are technicalities that a corporation
must comply with to be considered a QSBC, a professional corporation generally
would be eligible for the capital gains exemption as long as virtually all of
the assets of the corporation were actually used in the active business ("all or
substantially all of the assets" of the corporation must be used in an active
business). To keep the corporation an eligible QSBC, the "excess" funds retained
and invested in the corporation as suggested above would have to be moved out
from time to time, prior to any sale of the shares. Without going into the
detailed procedure specifically, there are techniques for doing
so.
4. income
splitting
setting up of a
professional corporation may allow the professional to allocate some portion of
their income to lower income family members such as a spouse or a child.
The regulations
regarding professional corporations require that only professionals may own
shares of a professional corporation. Accordingly, it is not possible for a
spouse to own shares of the corporation and to receive dividends as a way of
splitting income. To split income with other family members, the income must be
paid in the form of salaries or wages. It is not necessary for a sole
practitioner to be incorporated in order to pay a salary to a family member.
However, incorporation may provide greater justification for the salaries or
wages as the corporation will generally require more administrative effort than
a proprietorship.
Only salaries
or wages that are reasonable in relation to the services provided by the
employed family member are deductible. If the spouse or child does not perform
substantive services to the corporation, no salary or wage can be justified.
A professional
corporation does require more administration than a proprietorship - a fact that
may be considered a disadvantage to incorporation. At least some of that
administration - bookkeeping and record keeping, banking, payroll services, etc.
- could be undertaken by the family member and a reasonable salary paid.
5. other deductions
a professional
corporation would allow the professional opportunities to deduct for tax
purposes amounts that would not be deductible to him as a proprietor. Noting
that the key employee of the professional corporation will be the professional
himself, possible items that may be deductible through a professional
corporation are:
a. private health plan for
employees
b. scholarships to children of employees of the professional
corporation.
In undertaking
any such plan, the details should be thoroughly documented and executed. Many
otherwise sound tax plans have failed because of inadequate or incomplete
documentation. It is also essential that any plan put in place be followed in
its details. Again, many tax plans have failed because the taxpayer decided - or
inadvertently - took a shortcut and failed to follow through with the details of
the plan.
Disadvantages of professional incorporation
There are
disadvantages to professional incorporation. Most of the disadvantages deal with
the increased administration, increased complexity and increased costs to
administer.
The additional
costs would include the cost to incorporate, probably about $2,000 to $3,000,
including legal and accounting fees. The cost will be more than the normal cost
to incorporate as professional corporation involves additional steps not
normally required for a simple incorporation. These include the need to obtain
prior approval to incorporate from the governing professional association. The
incorporation of an existing professional practice will also generally require
the filing of a special income tax election under section 85 of the Income Tax
Act to avoid unpleasant tax surprises arising on the transfer of the practice
assets to the corporation.
There will
usually be increased cost to administer the corporation on an ongoing basis,
again including legal and accounting costs of, say, $2,000 to $3,000 or more
annually depending on the complexity and quality of the bookkeeping. The
corporation is a separate legal entity and as such must have annual financial
statements and federal and Ontario corporation tax returns, separate for the tax
filings of the professional. The corporation must also have annual director's
resolutions and shareholder's minutes drafted for such matters as the election
of officers and directors, approval of financial statements, and the waiver of
the audit requirement normal for corporation under the Business Corporations Act
(Ontario).
Offsetting some
of the additional cost may be savings related to some simplification of the
professional's personal tax compliance since his or her professional income
would be reduced to a T4 or T5 slip.
There is both
more flexibility and more complexity in determining how the professional draws
his income. As a unincorporated proprietor, the professional is taxed on the
income from the business, whether he draws it or not. With a professional
corporation, the professional has the ability to determine how much income he
takes and what form he takes it. In general, there are two ways in which he may
take his income:
1. salary
the professional
will be an employee of his professional corporation. He will decide how much of
the available income will be paid to him as salary. That salary will be subject
to normal source deductions that must be remitted monthly be the 15th of the
month following the payment of the salary. T4 information must be filed annually
by February 28th of the following year in respect to the salaries paid in the
previous calendar year. Normal source deductions will include income taxes and
CPP contributions but not Employment Insurance premiums. The professional will
have to take some of his income as salary if he wishes to make RRSP
contributions or CPP contributions as only employment income (and
self-employment income, which he will have ceased to receive) qualify. Salaries
paid to the professional are tax deductible to the corporation and are fully
taxable to the professional employee. If all of the professional corporation's
income were drawn as salary by the professional, the net effect to the
professional will approximate the after tax situation as if he had never
incorporated.
2. dividends
the corporation can pay
dividends to the shareholder/professional. To do so, the director must pass a
director's resolution to that effect. T5 information must be filed annually by
February 28th of the following year for any dividends paid in the previous
calendar year. Dividends are not subject to withholding for tax or CPP and do
not generate any RRSP contribution room. While dividends are taxable to the
shareholder at preferential tax rates compared to salary, dividends are not tax
deductible to the corporation and consequently must be paid out of the after tax
funds of the corporation. When the corporate and personal taxes are added
together, the resulting total tax will approximate the total tax payable on the
equivalent amount of employment income (referred to as "integration").
Conclusion
Incorporation is
no panacea for all of the professional's tax and financial concerns. There are
additional costs and complexities that some professionals may not be willing to
deal with. All the same, most professionals will realize a benefit from
incorporation. Each professional should carefully consider his own situation
before undertaking this step. In making your decision, keep in mind that setting
up the professional corporation in the first place is far simpler than unwinding
it later if you decides that incorporation was not appropriate.
Please call me if
you would like to discuss how professional incorporation could affect your
situation.
John G.
Patte
Chartered Accountant
PERSONAL TAX PLANNING
by
John G. Patte, C.A.
Introduction
Tax planning
should not be considered an end in itself - it is an integral part of your
overall financial and business planning and should be considered in light of
your personal goals. Many tax saving ideas may in fact move you further away
from achieving your most important financial goals. Investments in risky tax
shelter investments may save taxes but leave you with an investment of little
value and a severe debt hangover. A poorly designed income-splitting scheme may
save short-term taxes but distort your estate planning objectives.
Good tax planning
then is more about achieving your personal financial and business goals than it
is about reducing your tax load. Good tax planning begins with sound personal
and business planning.
Tax planning
should be a year-round activity, not one that you consider just at the end of
the year or at the RRSP deadline or in April. By then, you may have missed
opportunities. Asking your tax consultant how you can reduce your taxes after
the income has been earned or after various transactions have been completed is
like locking the barn door after the horses have escaped. A few of the "horses"
may be recoverable - there are some options available on filing your tax return
- but mostly, his role will be limited to merely helping you count how many
"horses" have escaped.
With these
comments in mind, let's look at a few ways that you may be able to reduce your
taxes.
Employment Income
Opportunities for
reducing taxes on employment income may be limited but here are some ideas that
may be relevant to you:
1. Non-taxable
employee benefits
|
Consider
renegotiating your compensation to convert taxable income into useful
non-taxable benefits
|
Cash compensation,
bonuses and certain benefits may be necessary for our day-to-day lifestyle but
they also increase our tax load. Some benefits though may reduce our need for
cash income or improve our long term financial position without adding to our
tax liability:
-
employer
contributions to pension plans, deferred profit sharing plans, group sickness
and accident plans, private health plans;
-
employee
discounts, subsidized meals, distinctive uniforms and special clothing and
protective footwear (including laundry costs), social/athletic club memberships
mainly for the purpose of promoting the employer's business (which unfortunately
would not be deductible to the employer);
-
non-cash gifts
and awards with a value less than $500 (including taxes) in the
year;
-
personal
counseling for mental/physical health, re-employment and
retirement;
-
moving expense
reimbursement (including in some cases mortgage interest
subsidies).
2. Employee stock
options
|
Employee
ownership through stock options can provide tax and other benefits to both the
business owner and the employee
|
Canadian-controlled private corporations - employers may reward arm's
length employees by allowing them to acquire shares in the employer at
discounted prices without any current income tax cost to the employee. The
employer benefits by not incurring any current outlay of cash; and stock options
could be used as part of a long-term succession plan to retain, motivating and
prepare a valued employee for future purchase of the business.
For the employee, there may
be considerable long-term benefits far exceeding the current value of the
shares; the feeling that he will benefit beyond his cash income from helping to
build the business; there is also of course the risk that the business may not
be successful and the shares may be worthless.
A few comments concerning
taxation and general business issues:
3. Employee
Automobiles
|
Consider
reimbursement for employee use of the employee's automobile based on a
reasonable per kilometre
allowance
|
Reasonable allowance based
on business distance traveled is not taxable. Any allowance or reimbursement
(e.g., fixed monthly allowance) paid by the employer that is not based on
business distance traveled is taxable and should be entered on the employee's T4
slip.
Employers can deduct a "per
kilometre" allowance up to $0.41per km for the first 5,000 km and $0.35 per km
thereafter. Higher allowances may in some cases still be considered reasonable
and not taxable to the employee but they will not be fully tax-deductible to the
employer.
4. Employee
Automobiles
|
Consider
deducting the cost of business use of the employee's automobile against
employment income
Maintain automobile log of your personal and business
travel to support your
deduction
|
If no reasonable per
kilometre allowance is provided, or where the allowance is added to the
employee's income, the employee may deduct actual costs of operating his
automobile for employment purposes:
- employer must complete form
T2200 Conditions of Employment;
- employee should maintain a
log of employment use or risk disallowance of the expense;
- employee must maintain
records of actual costs, including gas, repairs, car washes, insurance, licence,
auto club membership, financing costs, lease costs, purchase costs;
- limitations exist on the
amount of tax depreciation (capital cost allowance or CCA) and financing costs
or lease costs that may be deducted.
5.
Employer-provided Automobiles
| Employer-provided vehicles
offer substantial benefits to employees but carry a significant taxable
benefit |
There are two parts to the
taxable benefit added to the employee's T4 for use of an employer-provided
automobile:
- standby charge - 2% of the
original cost of the vehicle per month that it is available for employee use, or
2/3 of the lease cost (plus GST), which may be reduced if employment use is more
than 50% of total use and personal use is less than 1,667 km per month (i.e.,
20,004 km/year);
- operating costs - benefit
is calculated in one of two methods:
- $0.17 per km driven for
person use, less any reimbursement to the employer within 45 days after the end
of the year;
- 50% of the standby costs if
the vehicle is used at least 50% for business and the employee notifies employer
in writing by December 31, less any reimbursement to the employer within 45 days
after the end of the year.
To reduce the taxable
benefit, consider:
- maintaining automobile logs
of your personal and business travel to support benefit calculation;
- purchasing an older
employer-provided vehicle since the standby charge is computed on original cost
no matter how old it is;
- notifying employer of
intention to use the 50% of standby costs for operating benefits;
- reimbursing employer for
100% of personal-use operating expenses.
6. Loans To
Employees
|
Employees may
benefit from low-cost loans from the employer even with taxable benefit. Paying
tax on the benefit may be less costly than paying the full interest
costs
|
|
Now may be an
ideal time to lock in a low interest rate benefit for a house purchase
loan.
|
For low and
no-interest loans, the taxable benefit is computed as the difference between
interest computed at a rate prescribed quarterly by Canada Customs & Revenue
Agency and the interest that the employee actually pays on the loan within 30
days of the end of the year.
The benefit related to a
home purchase loan is calculated at the lower of current prescribed rate and the
rate in effect at the time the loan was given, less the amount repaid by the
employee within 30 days of the end of the year.
A deduction may be claimed
for the amount of the taxable benefit for interest on a home relocation loan of
up to $25,000 for up to five years. To qualify, the employee must have purchased
a home in connection with a move in Canada that is at least 40 km closer to the
employee's new place of employment as a consequence of a change in the location
of employment.
The taxable benefit for
no/low interest loans is considered to be interest paid in the year. If the loan
were used to earn income from business or investment, the taxable benefit may be
deducted as a carrying charge.
7. Employment
Expenses
|
Deduct
expenses incurred in connection with
employment
|
Commission sales
employees may deduct a variety of expenses related to the earning of their
commission income, up to the amount of their commission income, when these
expenses are not reimbursed by the employer. Meals and entertainment expenses
are restricted to 50% of the cost (except when incurred at a lodge, camp or golf
course - these may not be deductible at all based on recent tax
cases).
Employees without commission
income may deduct employment-related expenses on a more restrictive
scale:
- office rent (but not
mortgage interest and property taxes incurred instead of rent, or insurance);
for employees working out of their homes, utilities and maintenance
costs;
- salary of an
assistant;
- cost of supplies
consumed;
- automobile expenses,
including CCA (CCA is restricted on vehicles costing more than $30,000 plus
related PST and GST; restrictions also apply to interest and lease
costs).
In either case, form T2200
Conditions of Employment must be completed by the employer and should be filed
with paper returns.
8. GST
Rebates
|
Employees
claiming automobile expenses or other employment-related expenses may claim a
rebate for the GST included in the cost
claimed
|
To claim the
rebate, the employee should:
- retain supporting receipts
showing the supplier's GST registration number;
- know the employer's GST
registration number; (employees of GST-exempt employers are not eligible for the
GST rebate - e.g., insurance agents);
- claim the expenses in the
year incurred including GST;
- include the amount of the
GST rebate in the employee's income in the following year.
Business
Owners and Professionals
9. Fiscal year
end for unincorporated businesses
|
Since 1995,
unincorporated businesses must use December 31 as the year end for tax
purposes
Except where they elect to use the alternative
method
|
An exception to
the December 31 rule may arise where the business elects to use an alternative
method of computing income. Certain businesses, such as partnership with members
other than individuals, are not eligible for the alternative method. Also, once
the alternative method is revoked or the business becomes ineligible, the
alternative method may not be used thereafter for that particular
business.
The alternative method is
available to new businesses that were not in place at the end of
1994.
- use the alternative method
if there are non-tax reasons for using it (e.g., business cycle, financing
reporting for banking purposes);
- use the alternative method
to defer income for tax purposes if income is increasing;
for new businesses
in 2003 and you choose the alternative method, consider reporting some income in
2003 to reduce your 2004 tax liability;
- for new businesses in 2003
using the alternative method, the election must be filed by June 15,
2004.
For businesses that had
non-calendar year ends before 1995, these rules resulted in more than 12 months
of income being reported for tax purposes in 1995. To alleviate some of the tax
cost, a reserve was allowed to
spread the additional income out over up to
10 years by claiming a special reserve. For each year since 1995, the business
person was obliged to include in income a portion of the reserve. By the end of
2004, there will remain no further reserve.
10. Owner's
remuneration
|
Benefit from
flexibility - consider how much remuneration, in what form that remuneration
should be paid and when the remuneration should be
paid
|
Since 1972, the
tax system for small business has attempted to "integrate" the tax of the
corporation and that of the shareholders to nullify any advantage of
incorporation. In theory, the tax payable by a sole proprietor on his business
income should be equal to the total tax on the same business income earned
through a corporation if the corporate tax and the personal tax on salary and
dividends were added together. Surtaxes and variations in provincial tax rates
mean that integration is generally less than perfect.
One of the main benefits of
incorporation remains the owner's has control over the amount, timing and form
of his remuneration. This control may allow the owner to optimize and reduce the
overall tax load. Yet, for such a mundane issue, the relevant factors can be
intimidating:
- income in the corporation
is taxed at 18.62% up to $225,000; from $225,001 to $300,000 - 27.62% above
$300,000 - 38.95% (36.95% for manufacturers);
- dividends are not
deductible to the corporation; salaries and bonuses are deductible;
- bonuses should usually be
accrued payable to active shareholders to reduce corporate income below the
$225,000 threshhold, (or possibly $300,000 because of the reduced corporate tax
rate up to $300,000; accrued bonuses must be paid within 179 days of the
corporate year end to be deductible;
- dividends up to about
$29,000 can be paid without any personal income tax if the recipient has no
other income; individuals with deductions in excess of other income (e.g., RRSP,
carrying charges, alimony, rental losses) may be able to take larger amounts of
dividends before paying tax;
- retention of income in the
corporation may result in a substantial tax deferral because of the lower
corporate tax rate;
- corporations with
investment income may have refundable taxes that can be refunded only with the
payment of taxable dividends by the corporation at the rate of $1 of refund for
each $3 of dividends;
- dividends will reduce
cumulative net investment losses (CNIL) that may interfere with the claiming of
the capital gains deduction on the sale of shares of a qualified small business
corporation;
- US citizens may not benefit
from the Canadian tax preference accorded dividends;
- earned income (income from
employment, self-employment, net rental income, alimony) is needed if one wishes
to make RRSP contributions - pay sufficient salary or bonuses to allow for the
desired amount of RRSP contribution next year;
- similarly, employment or
self-employment income is required to make CPP contributions, a factor that may
be important to those within 10 years of retirement;
- salary is more effective in
reducing alternative minimum tax (AMT) that may arise on tax-preference items
(such as large capital gains) than dividends;
- dividends may be preferred
to salary if the corporation has loss carry forwards or tax credits available to
offset income or tax in the corporation;
- salaries will increase
Employer Health Tax in the corporation if total salaries and wages exceed
$400,000 for the calendar year;
- dividends paid out of the
corporation's capital dividend account can be received free of any
tax;
- repayment of amounts loaned
to the corporation by the shareholder and reduction of share capital can be
received by the shareholder as a tax-free return of capital;
- salaries can be paid to a
lower income spouse and/or children who contribute their services to the
business to make use of their lower tax rates and personal tax credits and
reduce corporate tax; salaries should be reasonable in relation to the work
performed by them;
- dividends must be paid
proportionately to the share ownership of any particular class of
shares;
- dividends on a junior class
of shares may be restricted unless appropriate dividends are also paid on more
senior share classes, which shares may be held by other shareholders;
- interest expense incurred
in the corporation on funds borrowed to pay dividends may not be tax-deductible
if the corporation is in a deficit; (paying dividends from corporation without
sufficient surplus may result in other difficulties and should be reviewed with
the corporate lawyer).
11. Other
matters relevant to tax planning to business owners
Spousal
partnership
|
An
unincorporated business may be structured as a partnership between spouses to
achieve tax reductions through income
splitting
|
A spousal
partnership is feasible if the both spouses
either:
-
contribute
substantial time and skills to the business;
-
invest property
(including cash) in the business
Splitting of
income in the partnership need not be equal but should be reasonable in the
circumstances, preferably based on a written partnership agreement. It should be
consistent from year to year, based on fixed percentages or on a formula, not
arbitrarily - Canada Customs & Revenue Agency may reallocate partnership
profits that have been allocated arbitrarily for tax advantage or may question
the existence of the partnership.
Shareholder
loans
|
Repay loans
to shareholders before the end of the next fiscal
year
|
The amount of any
loan made to a shareholder in one year that is not repaid before the end of the
following year must be added to the shareholder's income for tax purposes in the
year that the loan was made. While there are some exception to these rules, the
exceptions are severely restricted by the Income Tax Act. If an amount is
included in the shareholder's income for one year, a deduction is allowed for
the amount of any loan repaid. Repayments should not be part of a series of
loans and repayments.
-
shareholder
loans and indebtedness should be repaid before the end of the fiscal
year;
-
where amounts
have previously been included in income as a result of the shareholder loan
rules, consider repaying all or a portion of the amount before the end of the
calendar year.
Incorporate an
unincorporated business
|
Consider
incorporating your business
|
|
Professionals
in particular should now consider the option of incorporation not previously
available
|
Owners of
unincorporated businesses should consider incorporating to take advantage of the
tax planning opportunities, including control of personal income for tax
purposes and tax deferral.
Incorporation may
also allow a business owner to sell his business for a tax-exempt capital gain
of up to $500,000 by claiming the capital gains deduction for shares of
qualified small business corporations. Non-tax considerations (e.g., limited
liability and isolation of non-business assets from business risks) may also
enter into the decision to incorporate.
-
When
incorporating an existing business, consider filing a special income tax
election to avoid unexpected taxation on accrued gains, including unbooked
goodwill, small tools, inventory, recaptured depreciation and capital
gains;
-
consider filing
a special income tax election to allow the corporation to claim as bad debts
uncollected accounts receivable transferred to the corporation;
-
consider
whether a spouse should be added as a shareholder for income-splitting and
estate planning purposes.
Shareholders'
agreement
| Draft a formal
shareholders' agreement whenever there are two or more
shareholders |
A shareholders'
agreement should be drafted for corporations where there are more than one
shareholder, including those in which the only shareholders are family members,
to protect their individual interests, minimize shareholder disputes and ensure
that there is an orderly transition in the event of death, disability or
retirement of a shareholder. The valuation of shareholders' interests and the
funding of any payments to a shareholder or his estate on voluntary or
involuntary withdrawal are important issues to be considered. Existing
shareholders' agreements should be reviewed periodically to ensure that they
remain consistent with the wishes and personal circumstances of the shareholders
and that they remain valid in light of legislative
changes.
Investors
12. Investment
fundamentals
|
Maximize
after-tax real rate of return from investments in relationship to the associated
risk
|
Since interest, dividends
and capital gains are each taxed differently, taxation will affect the end
return.
Inflation effects may
confuse the issue. During periods of high inflation, nominal rates of return may
appear relatively high. However, that high nominal return is subject to tax,
reducing the bottom line. Meanwhile, inflation is eroding the investment,
reducing purchasing power of the capital invested. Consider the following
example:
| |
Low
inflation
|
High
inflation
|
| Inflation rate
|
2%
|
8%
|
| Nominal
interest rate |
6%
|
12%
|
| Marginal tax
rate |
50%
|
50%
|
| Investment |
$1,000
|
$1,000
|
| Interest earned
in one year |
$60.00
|
$120.00
|
| Tax on
interest |
30.00
|
60.00
|
| After-tax
return |
30.00
|
60.00
|
| Add capital
invested discounted for inflation |
980.00
|
920.00
|
| |
|
|
| Total
amount |
$1,010.00
|
$
980.00
|
In real after-tax terms, the
return in the low inflation example is a positive 1% compared to a negative 2%
return in the high inflation/high nominal rate of return example.
(We should be cautious how
we interpret examples such as these. While the government publishes a consumer
price index, the figures are of only general interest. Each of us, depending on
our consuming habits, family situation, age and geography, has our own personal
rate of inflation that may not relate to the published
figures.)
13. Interest
income
|
Report
accruing interest income annually
|
Interest earned
on investments acquired after 1989 must be reported for tax purposes annually on
the anniversary date of the investment. Interest income receives no preferential
tax treatment and is taxable at normal tax rates - the maximum tax rate in
Ontario in 2003 is 46.41%.
14. Dividend
income
|
Benefit from
preferential tax rate on dividends
|
Dividends from
Canadian corporations receive preferential tax treatment in Canada. First, the
actual amount of the dividend is "grossed up" by 25% - the taxable amount is
125% of the actual amount. Then, a non-refundable dividend tax credit
approximately equal to the amount of the gross-up is allowed as a reduction of
the tax payable. At the maximum marginal tax rate in Ontario, the effective tax
rate on dividends is 31.34%. The net result of this preferential tax treatment
to the investor is that the return on dividend-paying investments need be only
78% of the return on interest-bearing investments to yield the same amount after
tax. Put another way, a 5% dividend yield is equivalent to a 6.4% interest
rate.
-
consider
investing in high yield dividend-paying shares;
-
but consider
that dividend-paying shares may be more interest-sensitive - should interest
rates increase, the market value of the shares may decrease more than
interest-bearing investments; in fact, interest-bearing investments such as
Canada Savings Bonds will suffer no decrease in market value since they may
always be disposed of for their principal amount
-
US citizens,
taxable on their world income including Canadian-source dividends, do not
receive the same preferential tax treatment in the US; the beneficial tax
treatment in Canada may be lost as a result of paying higher US taxes on the
dividends.
15. Capital
gains and losses
|
Benefit from
preferential tax rates on capital
gains
|
Capital gains receive
preferential tax treatment in Canada since only 50% of the amount of the gain is
added to income for tax purposes.
Capital gains are calculated as the
excess of the proceeds of disposition over the taxpayer's cost of tax purposes
(adjusted cost basis or ACB); if the ACB exceeds the proceeds, the taxpayer
has a capital loss; capital gains and capital losses are netted in the year and
50% of the net amount is either the taxable capital gain or allowable capital
loss for the year. Taxable capital gains are added to income; allowable capital
losses may be carried over to other years as net capital losses and offset
against taxable capital gains in the three previous year or in any subsequent
year.
- consider carrying back net
capital losses against taxable capital gains of the previous three
years;
- but, if the capital gains
deduction were used in the previous year to offset the taxable capital gain, it
may be preferable to carry the net capital loss forward to be applied against
future capital gains;
- consider realizing accrued
losses before the end of the taxation year if there are realized gains in that
year or any of the previous three years; allow sufficient time before the end of
the year for the share sale to clear.
16. Capital gains
reserves
|
Defer capital
gains by claiming allowable reserves
|
A portion of a
capital gain may be deferred for tax purposes if all or a portion of the
proceeds is not due until after the end of the year. The reserve may spread the
gain out over up to five years as long as at least 20% of the gain is taxable
each year. For instance, assume that 10% of the proceeds were received in the
year of sale and the remaining 90% was receivable as set out below for the next
4 years. The maximum reserves and gains subject to tax would be as
follows:
| |
Proceeds
|
Cumulative
|
Maximum
|
Portion of
gain
|
| |
received
|
proceeds
received
|
reserve
|
taxed -
cumulative
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Year
1
|
10%
|
10%
|
80%
|
20%
|
|
Year
2
|
10%
|
20%
|
60%
|
40%
|
|
Year
3
|
60%
|
80%
|
20%
|
80%
|
|
Year
4
|
10%
|
90%
|
10%
|
90%
|
|
Year
5
|
10%
|
100%
|
0%
|
100%
|
- consider claiming maximum reserve to
defer taxation of the capital gain;
- ensure that the cash
received on sale and in each subsequent year will be sufficient to pay the tax
as it arises. The illustration above illustrates the short-term tax problem that
can arise: after Year 2, only 20% of the sale proceeds had been received but 40%
of the gain was taxable. A large disparity between the proceeds and the taxation
of the gain can cause cash flow difficulties.
- consider claiming less than
the maximum reserve in years when income is low or there are tax credits or
other deductions that would reduce the tax on the gain.
17. allowable business
investment losses (ABIL)
|
Claim
allowable business losses against other
income
|
A business
investment loss is a capital loss on the disposition of investment in a small
business corporation, either in its shares or in debt owing by the corporation.
A business investment loss may also arise on debt owing by a small business
corporation that is established to be a bad debt and on the investment of shares
of such a corporation where the corporation is bankrupt or insolvent. An ABIL is
50% of the business investment loss. This amount is reduced by previous claims
for the capital gains deduction. Unlike a normal net capital loss, an ABIL may
be deducted against other income in the year incurred. If the ABIL exceeds
income from all other sources, the result is a non-capital loss that can be
carried back three years or forward seven years to be applied against other
income. If the loss can not be fully applied in the carry over period, it
reverts to a normal net capital loss that may be carried forward
indefinitely.
-
claim an ABIL
when it is realized or established as delay may result in loss of the
deduction;
-
beware of
claiming an ABIL if you have previously claimed the capital gains deduction;
beware of claiming the capital gains deduction if you have previously claimed an
ABIL;
-
document the
investment as Canada Customs & Revenue Agency frequently requests additional
information concerning the investment and the loss, possibly including copies of
the financial statements of the corporation.
18. capital
gains deduction on qualified small business corporation shares
|
Claim the
capital gains deduction on the sale of shares of a qualified small business
corporation
|
The capital gains
deduction is still available for gains realized on shares of a qualified small
business
corporation. The maximum
exemption is $500,000 less the capital gains deduction previously claimed. If
there is a cumulative net investment loss (CNIL), only the taxable capital gain
in excess of the CNIL will qualify for the capital gains deduction.
Very briefly, shares of a
qualified small business corporation must meet the following
criteria:
- the shares must have been
owned continuously by the taxpayer or a related person for the immediately
preceding 24 months;
- during the previous 24
months, at least 50% of the corporation's assets, and at the time of
disposition, "all or substantially all" (at least 90%) of the corporation's
assets must have been used principally in an active business; the computation is
done at fair market value and would include unbooked goodwill.
In planning for the sale of
a qualified small business corporation and the related capital gains deduction,
consider the following:
- does the corporation
qualify for the capital gains deduction? Consider whether there may be excessive
non-active business assets and, if so, consider "purifying" the corporation by
removing those assets by transferring them to another corporation; (caution:
"purification" immediately before a share sale in contemplation of the sale may
be considered a "surplus strip" and may be treated as capital gain.
"Purification" transactions should be carried out without an actual sale in
sight.)
- does the taxpayer have a
CNIL? If so, consider paying dividends to eliminate it;
- consider "crystallizing"
the capital gains deduction for shares of the qualified small business
corporation by selling them to a related holding company or by exchanging the
shares for other shares using a special income tax election;
- will the capital gain
trigger AMT? If so, consider paying additional salary or realizing other income
to reduce the AMT;
- consider transferring an
unincorporated business to a corporation so that the sale will qualify for the
capital gains deduction; in that case, the 24 month holding period does not
usually apply.
19. capital gains
deduction on qualified farm property
| Claim the capital gains
deduction on the sale of qualified farm
property |
Qualified farm
property consists of real property used in the business of farming in Canada,
shares of a family
farm corporation, an interest in a family farm
partnership, eligible capital property. Complex holding period and other rules
apply in determining whether such property qualifies for the capital gains
deduction. The maximum exemption is $500,000 less the capital gains deduction
previously claimed.
-
farm property
may be transferred from parent to child at any value between cost and fair
market value;
-
consider
transferring the farm property at a value that will make full use of the
remaining capital gains deduction so that the child will have a higher cost base
for future dispositions.
20. Gain on
disposition of principal residence
|
Make optimal
use of the principal residence exemption on the sale of your principal
residence
|
The gain on sale
of a principal residence is exempt from tax. A principal residence is generally
any accommodation owned by the taxpayer and ordinarily inhabited by the
taxpayer, his spouse or child, provided that the taxpayer designates the
property as his principal residence.
Prior to 1982, it was
possible for both spouses to each designate a different property in any
particular taxation year. After 1981, however, only one property may be
designated by any family unit.
- for each principal
residence owned before 1982, consider there is benefit in separate ownership and
whether the value at December 31, 1981 should be established
- a seasonal residence such
as a cottage may qualify a principal residence; however, if the cottage is
designated as the principal residence for a particular year, the city house can
not also be designated for that same year.
21. Interest
expense
| Deduct interest expense
incurred to earn investment income |
| Convert loans incurred for
personal purposes to tax deductible loans |
Interest on funds
borrowed to purchase income-earning investments is deductible on either a "paid"
or "payable" basis as long as that basis is followed consistently. If the "paid"
basis is used then only the interest actually paid in the year is
deductible.
It may be possible to
re-arrange one's affairs to turn non-deductible interest into tax-deductible
interest by using personal cash or selling investments to pay off personal loans
and borrowing to re-purchase investments.
Any excess cash should be
applied against non-deductible loans in preference to tax-deductible
loans.
Limitation on the deduction
of interest expense may arise if at the time the investment was purchased the
interest rate exceeded the maximum possible yield on the investment. For
preferred shares, the interest expense will generally be deductible if the
interest rate does not exceed the grossed up amount of the preferred dividend.
For instance, if the interest rate is 6% and the actual dividend rate is 4% -
gross up to 5% - part of the interest expense may be disallowed.
Interest expense related to
an investment that has been disposed of at a loss will continue to be
tax-deductible if the proceeds of sale are applied to reduce the loan to the
extent possible or the proceeds are used to purchase some other income-earning
investment.
Interest on funds borrowed for personal purposes, such as to
purchase a home or cottage, is not tax-deductible. However, if you borrow with
the home or cottage as security and use the funds to invest, the interest on the
loan should be deductible. It is not the security that determines the
deductibility, but the use of the funds borrowed.
Interest expense related to
investment in an RRSP is not generally tax-deductible, except for pre-1982 RRSP
loans for this purpose.
While tax-deductible when
incurred, the interest expense is added to the cumulative net investment loss
(CNIL) balance and may effectively be "clawed back" by reducing the availability
of the capital gains deduction.
Interest expense is
technically only deductible when the funds are used to purchase income-earning
investments. However, interest incurred on funds borrowed by a shareholder of a
closely-held corporation to loan on an interest-free basis to his corporation is
generally allowed as tax-deductible. The corporation must use the funds to
acquire income-earning properties and business assets. The basis for this policy
is that income earned in the corporation is available for the payment of
dividends to the shareholder. (A similar connection does not apply where one
spouse borrows funds to re-loan to a corporation owned by the other
spouse.)
22. Investment
holding companies
|
Consider the
possible benefits of an investment holding
company
|
Prior to 1995,
significant tax deferrals were available by earning investment income through an
investment holding company. However, the deferral was effectively eliminated in
1995 when an additional refundable tax was introduced on investment income. All
the same, there may be benefits from using an investment holding
company:
- probate fee
planning;
- sheltering of assets from
US estate taxes;
- creating earned income for
RRSP purposes by paying director's fees;
- reduction of personal
income to reduce personal tax, eliminate OAS "clawback" and preserve GST and
Ontario tax credits.
23. Transfer of
investments to RRSP - eligible investments may be transferred to one's RRSP
either as a contribution in kind, the fair market value of which will be
considered the taxpayer's RRSP contribution, or as a sale for cash or other
property in the RRSP. A capital gain or capital loss will generally arise on the
transfer based on the fair market value at the time of transfer. A capital gain
is taxable in the same way as any other capital gain. Any capital loss is
denied.
24. Venture capital investments - Ontario investors may
invest up to $5,000 in labour-sponsored venture capital corporations (LSVCC).
The investor receives an Ontario and a federal tax credit equal to 15% of the
investment for each (i.e., 30% in total). The investment may be transferred to
the taxpayer's RRSP, compounding the tax saving. Alternatively, the investment
may be made outside the RRSP to recover the tax credits. If the taxpayer has
cash in his RRSP, that cash can be used to invest in a LSVCC and the taxpayer
will receive the same tax credit. Sale of the investment within eight years will
cause the taxpayer to repay the tax credits received.
25. Tax shelter
investments - while a properly structured tax shelter may have the desired
impact of reducing income taxes, they may not be appropriate investments for
many investors. The taxpayer should look beyond the immediate tax saving to
determine whether the investment makes economic sense when overall after-tax
return and risk are considered.
Tax shelter investments can take many
forms, including flow-through shares, film production limited partnerships,
limited partnership commission arrangements.
To evaluate a tax shelter,
consider the following:
- financial risk;
- rate of return;
- liquidity;
- reasonableness of
underlying assumptions in cash flow and profitability analyses;
- tax deferral confirmation,
based on an advanced tax ruling from Canada Customs & Revenue
Agency;
- history of promoters or
developers;
- administrative
costs.
Alternative minimum tax
(AMT) may substantially reduce the income tax benefits that an investor hopes to
obtain from a tax shelter investment. While a tax shelter may reduce regular
taxable income and tax calculated on regular taxable income, tax shelter losses
and related carrying charges (as well as RRSP deductions and the non-taxable
portion of capital gains) are not deductible for AMT purposes. The adjusted AMT
taxable income is then computed by deducting a special $40,000 AMT deduction. A
flat 17% (federal only) rate is applied to the resulting AMT taxable income to
calculate the AMT. If the AMT is greater than the regular tax, the taxpayer pays
the higher AMT tax, including the surtaxes and provincial tax on this
base.
Should AMT arise, the excess of the AMT over the regular tax in
that year may be carried forward for up to seven years and applied to reduce
regular tax to the extent that the regular tax in that year exceeds the AMT.
Therefore, AMT may not be a permanent tax.
Family Tax
Planning
26.
Home Buyers' Plan
|
First time
home buyers may use RRSP savings toward their home
investment
|
The Home Buyers' Plan has
been extended indefinitely but has been restricted to first-time home buyers.
The plan allows eligible taxpayers to withdraw funds from their RRSPs, up to
$20,000, to assist with the financing of their home purchase. To be considered a
first-time home buyer, neither the taxpayer nor his spouse must have owned a
home or lived in it as their principal place of residence in any of the
immediately preceding five years.
- a home must be purchased by
October 1 of the year following the withdrawal of the funds;
- no tax will be withheld
from the funds withdrawn from the plan;
- caution: RRSP contributions
within 90 days of the withdrawal will not be deductible;
- any amount withdrawn must
be repaid to the RRSP over a period not exceeding 15 years, commencing in the
second calendar year following withdrawal; the repayment may be made in the year
or within 60 days of the end of the year; Canada Customs & Revenue Agency
send affected taxpayers an annual notice of the amount of the minimum repayment
necessary;
- any shortfall in the
repayment for a particular year must be added to income in that year;
27. Charitable
donations
|
Claim
charitable donations in the year that the donation is
made
|
Donations to
registered charities entitle the donor to a federal tax credit of 16% of the
amount of the donation up to $200; above $200 in the year, the tax credit is
29%. The combined federal and Ontario tax credits are approximately 25% up to
$200 and 46% thereafter. The maximum amount of charitable donations in any year
is generally 75% of the taxpayer's net income. Excess donations may be carried
forward for up to five years.
For donations made in the
year of death and the immediately preceding year the donation limit is 100% of
net income. Donations made in the taxpayer's will are considered to have been
made in the year of death.
For donations "in kind" - a
gift of property rather than cash - the property is generally considered to have
been disposed of at its fair market value, with whatever income or capital gains
consequences that may entail, and to have been donated at the same value.
However, a taxpayer may elect to report the disposal and the donation at any
value between the adjusted cost base and fair market value. Also, the amount of
the donation is not limited to 75% of the taxpayer's net income. Gifts of
business property (e.g., inventory or capital assets such as a computer) are
treated as if the property were disposed of at donation amount and therefore may
increase business income.
- donations must be supported
by an official tax receipt from the charitable organization; unofficial receipts
and cancelled cheques do not constitute official receipts;
- "contributions" made in
connection with fund-raising activities such as a circus held by charitable
organizations are generally not charitable donations for tax purposes; nor is
the excess paid over market value for goods or services purchased from a
charitable organization;
- charitable organizations,
however, may issue charitable donation receipts in connection with charitable
events such as a fund-raising dinner for the excess paid by the attendee over
the organizer's cost;
- donations from both spouses
should usually be claimed in the return of one of them if doing so will result
in the total amount exceeding $200; this applies to donations made by payroll
deduction and reported on the T4 slip;
- donations are only
creditable if they are actually paid in the year or in the previous five years.
Unpaid pledges are not creditable. Donations purposely or inadvertently not
claimed in the year that the donation was actually made may be claimed in a
subsequent year within the five year carryover period.
- gifts to the Crown (Canada
or a province) qualify for tax credit but are not limited by 75% of net income;
gifts to hospitals and universities do not automatically fall under such rules
but may sometimes be structured as gifts to the Crown;
- special rules apply to
gifts of objects certified as Canadian Cultural Property by the Canadian
Cultural Property Export Review Board and gifted to a designated institution or
public body: capital gains on disposition are not taxable and the 75% of net
income restriction does not apply;
- special rules also apply to
gifts of ecologically sensitive land: while the taxpayer is able to claim a tax
credit based on the donation at its fair market value (as certified by the
Minister of the Environment), the taxable capital gain is only 25% of the total
capital gain instead of the normal 50%.
28. Political
donations
|
Claim
political donations in the year that the donation is
made
|
Tax credits are
available for both federal and Ontario political contributions. An official
receipt must be filed with the taxpayer's return for the year. As with
charitable donations, each spouse is considered an agent for the other allowing
the family unit to optimize the tax credit between them. Because of the way that
the tax credit is calculated, it may not be advantageous to aggregate political
donations entirely in the return of one spouse - it may be preferable to split
the donations equally between spouses.
The federal tax credit is
computed as 75% of the first $200, plus 50% of the next $550, plus
33 1/3%
of contributions over $550, up to a maximum credit of $500; the maximum credit
is reached with contributions totaling $1,075; for 2004, the credit is scheduled
to increase to 75% of the first $400, 50% of the next $750 and 33 1/3% of
donations over $1,150 to a maximum credit of $650.
The Ontario tax credit is
computed as 75% of the first $300, plus 50% of the next $700, plus
33 1/3%
of contributions over $700, up to a maximum credit of $1,000; the maximum credit
is reached with contributions totaling $2,275.
29. Alimony
and maintenance
|
Deduct
periodic spousal support payments made under a written separation agreement or
court order
|
|
Child support
payments are no longer deductible or taxable for agreements after April 30,
1997
|
For 1996 and
prior years, alimony and maintenance payments are taxable to the recipient and
deductible to the payor, as long as certain conditions are met:
-
payments are
made on a periodic basis to the taxpayer's spouse or former
spouse;
-
for the
maintenance of the recipient, children of the recipient or the recipient and
children of the recipient;
-
the couple are
living separate and apart because of a breakdown in the
marriage;
-
payments are
made pursuant to a written separation agreement or court
order.
Certain third
party payments made under the separation agreement may be deductible (and
taxable).
Payments made before an
agreement is signed or a court order obtained are only deductible (and taxable)
if the agreement is signed or court order obtained before the end of the
following year and the agreement or order so specifies by referring to
subsection 60.1(3) of the Income Tax Act.
For child support payments
under agreements or court orders made after April 30, 1997 including amendments
to existing agreements, the payments will not be deductible by the payor (or
taxable to the recipient). Agreements entered into before May 1, 1997 are not
affected unless both spouses apply to Canada Customs & Revenue Agency to
have the new rules apply to payments after April 30, 1997. Alimony payments for
the support of the spouse or former spouse are similarly not affected by this
change.
30. Child care
expenses
|
Claim child
care expenses paid in the year
|
Child care
expenses are deductible only by the lower-income spouse unless that spouse is
infirmed, confined to an institution or in full-time attendance at a designated
educational institution. The amount is also limited to 2/3rd of the taxpayer's
earned income (income from employment or self-employment). The maximum deduction
is the total of $7,000 for each child under seven or infirm, and $4,000 for each
child between seven and fifteen.
Payments to the child's
parent or to any related person under age 18 are not eligible. Nor are
babysitting costs while the parents go to dinner and the movies.
The maximum amount claimable
for a boarding school and residential camps such as sports camps is limited to
1/40th of the maximum annual amount for that child - i.e., for a child over 7
years old, the maximum claim is $100 per week of attendance.
Receipts should be obtained
from the caregiver indicating the date of the service, the caregiver's name and
social insurance number and the amount paid.
31. Child tax
benefit
| Consider segregating and
investing the child tax benefit in the child's
name |
The child tax
benefit is a refundable, non-taxable benefit based on the number of children
under age 18 and the recipient's family income. The credit is reduced as income
increases at the rate of 2.5% of family net income above $33,487 (5% for
families with two or more children).
The maximum benefit is
$1,169 per child. For families with three or more children, there is a $82
supplement added for the third and each additional child. For children under
seven, there is an annual supplement of $232, but this supplement is reduced by
25% of any child care expenses claimed.
If the child tax credit
payments are co-mingled with the other funds of the parents, any income earned
on the investment of those funds will generally be taxable to the parent
recipient (usually the mother). However, if the funds are segregated and
separately invested for the child, the investment income will be taxable to the
child and not to the parent.
32. Income
splitting
| Minimize family tax costs
by splitting income and capital gains with lower income family
members |
Our so-called
"progressive" tax rate structure means that, as your income increases, so does
your marginal tax rate. Also, certain benefits and tax credits are "clawed back"
- e.g., Old Age Security benefits, age tax credits. Significant tax savings can
be realized by re-directing income and capital gains that would otherwise be
taxable to a high income family member to a family member with lower income. In
addition, lower-income family members may have unused tax credits available to
shelter additional income.
There are obstacles to
re-directing one's income. The income attribution rules are intended to minimize
opportunities for income splitting. The attribution rules state that:
- they apply when cash or
property is transferred by gift or loan either directly or through a trust to a
spouse or child under the age of 18; attribution also applies to the income
earned on loans to non-arm's length persons such as a child over the age of 18
unless the loan is interest-bearing at a rate equal to or greater than the
prescribed rate;
- the income earned from the
property or investment is taxable to the transferor;
- especially onerous rules
apply where a corporation is used for income-splitting purposes;
- special "kiddy tax" rules
apply on income earned by a minor from dividends paid on unlisted shares and
income from a partnership or trust derived from providing services or goods to
business carried on by a person related to the minor, or a corporation of which
the related person is a shareholder.
Despite the attribution
rules, it is still possible to split income with lower-income family
members:
- sale of property for fair
market value and loans under commercially available terms and rates do not
attract attribution; for a sale between spouses, a special election must be
filed to avoid attribution (otherwise the property will automatically transfer
at the vendor's adjusted cost base);
- gifts to adult children do
not attract attribution;
- by policy, Canada Customs
& Revenue Agency does not apply attributions to the investment of the child
tax benefit if the investment is segregated for the child;
- corporate attribution
generally will not apply under estate planning arrangements where the
objectives are other than income splitting;
- no attribution applies on
capital gains realized on property transferred to children or related persons
other than a spouse; (caution: the transfer of property to a related person is
treated as a sale at fair market value and may trigger a capital gain to the
transferor);
- CPP benefits may be split
without attribution;
- retirement income from a
spousal RRSP do not attribute back to the contributing spouse (although
withdrawals made from an RRSP or amounts withdrawn from a RRIF in excess of the
minimum amount will be added back to the income of the contributing spouse if
the withdrawal occurs with three years of the contribution);
- income earned on the
reinvestment of attributed income does not attribute: for instance, if Spouse A
gifts $1,000 to Spouse B and B invests the money to earn, say, $100 income on
the investment, that $100 will be taxable to A; however, if B then invests the
$100 income and earns $10 on that investment, that $10 is taxable to B, not to
A; over time, the non-attributed income can accumulate to significant amounts;
- arranging the family
financial affairs to allow the lower income spouse to accumulate investment
assets can also result in significant benefits over time; for instance, high
income Spouse A could pay for the personal expenses of the family - groceries,
mortgage payments, possibly B's personal tax liability, etc., and low income
Spouse B could invest his or her income; the investment income earned would be
taxable to B, the lower income spouse.
In a business, salary can be
paid to lower income family members for services provided to the business. The
key is to make sure that the salary is reasonable relative to the value of the
services provided. If the salary is reasonable, it will be deductible against
the business income and taxable to the lower income person. Excessive salaries
will be disallowed by Canada Customs & Revenue Agency. Note that there are
other effects of paying a salary: the recipient will generate RRSP contribution
room; payroll taxes will apply including CPP, EI, WSIB and possibly EHT,
although it may be possible to have the EI premiums waived on salary paid to a
spouse.
33. Registered Education
Savings Plans
| Contribute to RESP for
minor children to fund future higher education costs - the earlier the
better |
Taxation of investment income earned
on savings and the attribution rules provide obstacles to saving for the
education of children. However, RESPs offer parents and grandparents an
opportunity to save without paying tax currently on the accumulating income
earned on funds earmarked for the child's education.
A RESP is a special
investment fund or trust, organized by a promoter or trustee and registered with
Canada Customs & Revenue Agency for the purpose of allowing the accumulation
of funds for higher education. The parent or grandparent agrees to make payments
to the promoter and the promoter agrees to make educational assistance payments
to a specified child beneficiary when the child attends a post-secondary
educational institution. The contributions are not tax deductible but the income
is not taxed until it is withdrawn by the student and then it is taxable to the
student.
The maximum contributions
for each beneficiary is $4,000 per year to a lifetime maximum of $42,000. The
plan can not last longer than 25 years and no contributions can be made after 21
years.
The risk with RESPs is that
the child may not continue on to post-secondary education. In that case, the
contributions will be returned but the accumulated may not be. The return of the
contributions will not be taxable to the contributor. However, if the plan has
been in place for at least 10 years and the child is at least 21 years of age,
the accumulated income can be paid to the contributor. Subject to the normal
RRSP contribution limits, the RESP contributor may chose to transfer the income
to his or his spouse's RRSP up to a maximum of $50,000. Any amount in excess of
the amount transferred to the RRSP is taxable at 20%.
In addition to the
contributions and the accumulating income earned, the federal government makes
contributions to the RESP, referred to as Canada Education Savings Grant (CESG).
The maximum CESG is 20% of the parent's contribution or $400 in any year for
beneficiaries under 18 years of age, to a lifetime limit of
$7,200.
Retirement
Planning
34. Registered
pension plans (RPP)
|
Maximize your
RPP contributions and deduct
contributions
|
Registered pension plans are
an important source of retirement income for many Canadians. Some of the tax
rules have been set out below.
There are two basic types of
pension plans:
-
Defined benefit
plans - the amount of the employee's pension is defined by a formula in the
plan; the formula normally involves the employee's pensionable earnings and the
number of years of service with the employer or a related employer. The
employee's contribution are usually also defined by a formula - as a percentage
of earnings; based on actuarial evaluations, the employer's contributions will
usually vary depending on investment returns - where investment returns are
poor, the employer's contributions will have to increase to fill the gap; where
the investment returns are better then projected, employer contributions may be
reduced. The benefit to the employee is that he should always have the security
of knowing what his pension will be. The concern for the employer is that he may
not know what it will ultimately cost to fund that pension.
-
Defined
contribution plans (or money-purchase plans) - these are similar to RRSPs in
that the ultimate amount of the employee's pension is unknown. His pension will
be whatever the funds in the plan will buy as an annuity when he retires, which
will depend on the contributions and the return on investment. However, both the
employer and the employee know what their cost will be as their contributions
are defined in the plan. Those contributions are used to earn an investment
return. The amount accumulates until retirement and the pension annuity is
purchased.
Employer contributions to an
RPP are deductible to the employer and are not taxable to the employee.
Similarly, contributions made by the employee are deductible against the
employee's personal income in the year. Investment income is allowed to
accumulate tax free. Amounts paid out of the pension plan to the employee are
fully taxable when received. Under circumstances such as termination or early
retirement, the employee's accumulated credit in an RPP may be transferred free
of any tax to another RPP or to a locked-in RRSP.
For services after 1989,
employees can deduct all contributions made to a defined benefit plan. For
services before 1990, employees can deduct contributions to a defined benefit
plan up to $3,500 per year for each past service year of service provided before
1990 in which they were not a contributor to any RPP. For pre-1990 years when
the employee was a contributor to a RPP, the $3,500 per year limit is reduced by
any contributions deducted in the current year. Any undeducted contributions may
be carried forward and deducted when there is sufficient room within this
limitation.
For defined
contribution/money purchase plans, the maximum combined employer/employee
contribution for 2003 was $14,500, increasing to $15,500 for 2004.
The amount of the employee's
contribution is reported on the employee's T4 slip. Also reported on the T4 slip
is a "pension adjustment". For money purchase plans, the pension adjustment is
simply the total combined amount of the employer's and the employee's
contributions. For defined benefit plans, the PA is computed based on a formula
intended to estimate the cost of funding the accruing retirement pension. In
both cases, the PA must be taken into account in determining the employee's
maximum RRSP contribution for the following year.
35. Deferred
profit sharing plans (DPSP)
|
Consider
DPSPs to motivate, reward and retain key
employees
|
DPSPs may be
useful, particularly to smaller employers, as a means of motivating, rewarding
and retaining key employees. Employees, including owner-managers and their
families, owning over 10% of any class of share of the employer corporation are
not eligible for membership. Subject to specified limit equal to 50% of the
money purchase limit for RPPs ($6,250 for 2003), employer contributions must be
computed by reference to company profits. Employee can not make
contributions.
Amounts received by the
employee out of a DPSP are fully taxable. DPSP proceeds can be used to purchase
an annuity similar to a money purchase pension plan, in which case only the
annuity payments are taxable when received. Lump-sum payments out of a DPSP may
be transferred tax-free to another DPSP, RPP or RRSP only if transferred
directly between trustees of the plans.
36. Registered
retirement savings plans (RRSP)
|
Maximize your
RRSP contributions and deduct
contributions
|
RRSPs are the
primary tax shelter of ordinary Canadians. The billions of dollars that have
been accumulated in RRSPs represent a huge capital pool for investment in the
Canadian economy. For thousand of Canadians, particularly small business owners
and their employees, RRSPs represent the only tax-assisted means of saving for
retirement available to them. Despite their popularity and the massive amount of
information available, there remains considerable ignorance and misunderstanding
about RRSPs, how they work and how they are intended to benefit taxpayers.
Types of plans - virtually
every Canadian financial institution offers RRSPs. Most institutions in fact may
offer several types of plans. The consumer's choice is mind-boggling.
Compounding the problem is the fact that most taxpayers leave the decision to
the last moment when there is little time to consider their options. Still,
there are only three basic types of plan available:
- Deposit accounts - the most
common type is merely a deposit with a financial institution, usually a trust
company or bank. Deposit accounts are interest-bearing suitable to investors
particularly concerned about security of capital. The investment is usually
insured by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation within limits. There are
usually no separate fees charged by the financial institution as they use the
funds to earn a return higher than the amount paid to the depositor.
- Professionally managed
accounts - financial institutions offer funds that pool investments from many
investors and that are managed on behalf of investors by professional money
managers. Such funds invest in a wide variety of investments, including interest
bearing investments (money market funds, bond funds, mortgage funds) and
equities, subject to rules concerning Canadian content. "Balanced" funds and
"asset allocation" funds include a combination of interest-bearing and equity
investments. Some institutions operate several different funds, each with its
own objectives and investment criteria, and usually allow investors to switch
between funds at no cost. Security of capital and investment returns may vary
widely depending on the underlying investments. Neither the capital investment
nor the return on investment are guaranteed or secured, and past history is not
guaranty of future returns. There may or may not be administrative fees charged
for these funds, although there usually are no fees as the financial institution
charges a separate management fee directly against the fund.
- Self-directed plans -
self-directed plans are attractive to investors who want more control over their
investments. The investor agrees with a financial institution - bank, trust
company, investment dealer - to act as trustee for his RRSP and to perform the
necessary administrative functions required. The investor is left to decide on
the investments held in the plan, within the regulations set down for eligible
investments, such as interest-bearing investments, mutual funds, equities,
including foreign investments within limits (usually 30%, although foreign
content may reach as high as 50% in certain circumstances). It is even possible
to invest in an non-arm's length mortgage, including a mortgage on one's own
home, as long as specific rules are complied with (including the purchase of
mortgage insurance). Financial institutions usually charge an administrative fee
which amount may usually be paid out of funds in the plan or from personal funds
outside of the plan. The administrative fee is not tax deductible.
RRSPs have become so
commonplace that many Canadians have come to underrate the long-term benefits of
tax sheltering their earned and investment income to increase their retirement
income. Taxpayers benefit from RRSPs in several ways:
- Immediate impact -
immediate tax sheltering of employment and self-employment income;
- Intermediate impact -
investment income earned in the RRSP is not taxed currently but is allowed to
accumulate;
- Long-term impact - while
withdrawals are fully taxed, planning may allow the funds withdrawn to be taxed
at substantiallylower
tax rates than when the funds were earned - say, in the hand of a lower income
spouse (by using a spousal plan) or withdrawing when other income is reduced and
marginal tax rates are lower.
Contribution limits - the
amount of the contribution that may be deducted is based on the following
formula:
- Add - unused RRSP
contribution room carried forward from the prior year
- Add - RRSP deduction limit,
equal to the lesser of
$14,500 (for 2003) and 18% of earned income for the
prior year.
- Deduct - pension adjustment
(PA - see box on T4 slip) and past service
pension adjustment for the
year.
(A past service pension adjustment may arise where a RPP has been
amended
to improve benefits accruing with respect to prior years.)
Canada Customs & Revenue
Agency details its computation of the 2003 RRSP contribution limit for taxpayers
on the 2002 Notice of Assessment.
The maximum contribution
limits for future years is scheduled to increase, but you still must have
sufficient earned income. (See below for details of how to determine your earned
income.) The maximum limits and the required earned income are set out in the
following table:
|
Year
|
Maximum
limit
|
Minimum
earned income
|
| |
|
|
| 2003 |
$14,500 |
$80,556 |
| 2004 |
$15,500 |
$86,111 |
| 2005 |
$16,500 |
$91,667 |
| 2006 |
$18,000 |
$100,000 |
| 2007 and
beyond |
Subject to
indexing |
(Max. limit) /
18% |
Spousal RRSP contributions -
RRSPs offer taxpayers an opportunity for legalized income splitting of
retirement income. Regular RRSP contributions within the limits described above
may be made to the taxpayer's own plan, to a plan under which the taxpayer's
spouse is the beneficiary ("annuitant") or to some combination of the taxpayer's
and the spouse's plans. The taxpayer's contributions to a spousal RRSP have no
effect on the spouse's contribution limit. The spouse may make contributions to
the spouse's own plan, either the same plan to which the taxpayer made the
spousal contribution or to another plan. Because of the anti-avoidance rules
discussed below, it may be preferable for the spouse to make contributions to a
separate plan to which the taxpayer has not made any contribution.
To prevent taxpayers from
using spousal RRSPs as a short-term income splitting mechanism, the Income Tax
Act includes rules that require amounts withdrawn from a spousal RRSP to be
included in the contributor's income rather than the spouse's if the contributor
had made a contribution in the year of withdrawal or either of the previous two
years. This anti-avoidance rule does not apply to amounts received under a
regular RRSP annuity or to amounts received from a RRIF that do not exceed the
minimum amount required to be withdrawn under the RRIF.
As with other areas of the
Income Tax Act, "spouse" includes a common-law spouse. A taxpayer can make
deductible contributions to the RRSP of a common-law spouse.
Unused contribution room -
if the taxpayer contributes less than the maximum amount allowed, the excess is
carried forward to the following year and added to the deduction limit for that
year. Starting in 1996, the carry forward period became unlimited.
Undeducted contributions -
it may also happen that the taxpayer contributes more than his allowable limit.
Similarly, the taxpayer may make a contribution but decide not to deduct it for
the year even though it is within the allowable limits (for instance, where
income is particularly low for one year but expected to increase in the next
year). Undeducted RRSP contributions can be carried forward indefinitely and
deducted in future years.
Over-contributions -
contributions in excess of the deductible limit should be avoided by most
taxpayers. If the over-contribution exceeds $2,000, the excess is subject to a
penalty of 1% per month until the excess is removed by filing a special form
(T3012A).
- With this cautionary note
in mind, some taxpayers may wish to over-contribute within this $2,000 limit to
tax-shelter additional investment income
- Special transitional rules
apply to taxpayers who had over-contributed to their RRSPs prior to February 27,
1995 to allow them to phase out their over-contribution without penalty.
Earned income - the
calculation of earned income is the starting point in the determination of the
annual RRSP contribution limit. Earned income consists of the following
amounts:
Add:
- Salary, wages, employment
benefits;
- Net business income from a
proprietorship or partnership in which the taxpayer was actively
engaged;
- Net rental
income;
- Alimony and maintenance
receipts included in income;
- CPP disability pension (but
not regular CPP benefits);
- Supplementary unemployment
insurance benefits (but not EI benefits);
Deduct:
- Employment expenses and
union dues;
- Net business losses from a
proprietorship or partnership in which the taxpayer was actively
engaged;
- Net rental
losses;
- Alimony and maintenance
payments deducted from income.
Notably absent from the
earned income calculation are pension, DPSP, RRSP, RRIF and OAS benefits,
investment income such as interest and dividends, business income or loss from a
limited partnership, death benefits and retiring allowances (i.e., severance
payments). Of particular interest to business owners when considering the form
of their remuneration is that taking income as dividends will not generate RRSP
contribution room - they must take salary for this purpose.
Retiring allowances -
"retiring allowance" is the term used in the Income Tax Act to describe special
payments that may be paid to an employee or former employee on retirement or in
respect of a loss of employment, including amounts that may be received as
damages. A retiring allowance may be paid to the employee or, after the
employee's death, to a relation or dependent or the deceased's legal
representative.
Not included in the definition of retiring allowance but
included in the special rules for RRSPs are amount received out of "retirement
compensation arrangement" (RCA). In simple terms, a RCA is a plan or arrangement
under which an employer makes payments to a custodian or trustee on behalf of an
employee to fund the employee's retirement, but does not include a RPP, DPSP or
RRSP.
Amounts received as a
retiring allowance or as benefits out of a RCA are taxable in the year
received.
Within specified limits,
taxpayers are allowed to transfer amounts received as retiring allowances or RCA
benefits to their RRSP. The maximum amount is the sum of:
- $2,000 for each calendar
year (including part of a calendar year) prior to
1996 that the taxpayer was
employed by that employer;
- $1,500 for each year prior
to 1989 for which included above for which
employer contributions to a RPP or
DPSP have not vested in the employee.
For example, assume that an
employee was employed by his employer for 20 years prior to 1996, including two
years during which he was not a member of the pension plan. The employee's
maximum RRSP contribution under these rules would be $43,000:
20 years @ $2,000 per year
or $40,000
plus 2 years @$1,500 per ;year or $3,000.
The amount of the retiring
allowance may be transferred directly from the employer to the RRSP trustee or
it may be contributed by the employee during the year or within 60 of the end of
the year in which the amount was included in income. If the amount is
transferred directly by the employer, no tax need be withheld at source.
However, tax will be withheld on payments that are not made directly to the
RRSP. To have the amount transferred directly to his RRSP, the employee should
complete and provide to his employer Canada Customs & Revenue Agency form
TD2.
The special RRSP
contribution does not affect the taxpayer's regular RRSP contribution room
computed on his earned income - this special contribution is in addition to the
regular contribution. Unlike the regular contribution, however, any unused
portion of the maximum deduction may not be carried forward. Nor may the
contribution be made to a spousal plan.
To deduct a RRSP
contribution under these special rules, the taxpayer must so designate in his
tax return for the year by filing form T2097 with his return.
Caution: while the special
RRSP contribution for retiring allowances are deductible for the regular tax
calculation, it is not deductible for alternative minimum tax (AMT) purposes. A
large RRSP contribution may therefore not have the immediate tax saving impact
desired, although the excess AMT may be recovered in future years.
Other lump-sum transfers -
lump-sum amounts from a RPP or DPSP may be transferred directly to a taxpayer's
locked-in RRSP. Locked-in RRSPs fall under provincial and/or federal legislation
that restricts withdrawal before normal retirement age. Amounts may be withdrawn
in due course as an annuity or a life income annuity (LIF) similar to a
RRIF.
On death, an amount in the
deceased's RRSP may be transferred to the surviving spouse's RRSP without
incurring tax. More precisely, the surviving spouse must include the amount in
income and claim a deduction for the amount of the transfer to the survivor's
RRSP. This contribution is tax-deductible for both the regular tax and the AMT
calculation.
On breakdown of a marriage
or common-law relationship, an amount can be transferred without tax
consequences between the RRSP (or RRIF) of one spouse to that of the other
spouse as long as:
- the spouses are living
apart;
- the transfer is made
pursuant to a written separation agreement or order of a competent
tribunal;
- the recipient spouse is
within the age limit to have an RRSP;
- the transfer is made
directly between plans.
A transfer from one RRSP of
a taxpayer to another plan of the same taxpayer may be carried out without tax
consequences as long as the transfer is made directly between plans. If the
taxpayer has access to the funds for his own use, the rollover provisions will
not apply: the "transfer" will be taxable as a withdrawal and the contribution
will only be allowed within the normal RRSP contribution limits with the
possibility that a large amount could trigger a penalty for
over-contribution.
Withdrawals from RRSPs -
amounts received from a RRSP, either before or after maturity, are fully taxable
to the annuitant (or to the annuitant's spouse if the plan is a spousal plan and
the withdrawal is made with in the year of contribution or the two years
following the year of contribution).
Partial or complete
withdrawals before maturity are subject to withholding of tax at source as
follows:
- up to $5,000,
10%;
- between $5,000 and $15,000,
20%;
- over $15,000, 30%.
The income and tax withheld
are reported for the year on a form T4RSP. The tax withheld at source is
creditable against the actual tax reported by the taxpayer in the year. You
should be aware that the tax withheld is generally less than the actual tax on
the RRSP withdrawal: the withholding tax rate is generally less than the actual
marginal tax rate applicable to the income. Consequently, there is usually an
additional tax liability in the year of a RRSP withdrawal that the taxpayer
should be prepared for.
Maturity must occur by the
end of the year that the annuitant turns 69. On maturity, taxpayers have several
options:
- withdraw the accumulated
funds, subject to withholding and taxation as described above;
- purchase an annuity to
provide retirement income over a fixed term to age 90 in a regular flow of equal
monthly payments; if the annuitant's spouse is younger, the annuity may continue
until the spouse turns 90, if the annuitant so elects;
- purchase a life annuity to
provide retirement income over the rest of the annuitant's life, or over the
annuitant's and the spouse's lifetime if the joint life option is chosen, in a
regular flow of equal monthly payments; a guaranteed pay-out period may be
provided;
- transfer the funds to a
registered retirement income fund(RRIF), and receive payments from the RRIF of
at least a minimum amount; amounts in excess of the minimum amount may be
withdrawn from time to time.
The cost of a life annuity
is based on an actuarial calculation that takes into account the market rate of
interest and the age and health of the annuitant. Including a joint life option
and/or a guaranteed pay-out option has the impact of reducing the amount of the
annuity that could be paid from a fixed amount of funds because the pay-out
period tends to be longer. While building in these options may be prudent in
many cases, there may be alternatives if retirement is properly planned at an
early stage. For instance, the purchase of an insurance policy on the life of
the annuitant may be preferable to choosing a joint survivor option on the RRSP
maturity. (For instance, if the spouse should die before the annuitant, the
annuitant would be locked in to a reduced annuity for the remainder of his life
even though the joint feature would never be called upon.) However, cost and
insurability may make this option impractical or impossible unless the insurance
policy is purchased long before retirement.
The minimum RRIF amount is
based on the annuitant's age at the beginning of the year. For those under 71 at
the beginning of the year, the minimum amount is calculated by dividing the fair
market value of the RRIF at the beginning of the year by the excess of 90 over
the annuitant's age at the beginning of the year. For those age 71 and older,
the minimum RRIF amount depends on whether the RRIF was purchased before 1993.
For pre-1993 RRIFs, the minimum RRIF amount continues to follow the same formula
as used before age 71. For post-1992 RRIFs, and for pre-1993 RRIFs after age 78,
the minimum amount is set by regulation. The change in the formula allows for an
extended pay-out period beyond age 90 that was formerly not possible. At the
annuitant's option, the computation may be based on the age of annuitant's
spouse.
RRSP planning - the
following is a summary of some of the planning points available with
RRSPs:
- maximize RRSP contributions
particularly if you are years away from retirement; at 8%, $100 contributed
today is worth $466 contributed 20 years from now; regardless of the
carryforward provisions, those who fail to contribute early will never
completely catch up;
- consider making spousal
RRSP contributions, including contributions to a plan for a common-law spouse,
for legalized retirement income splitting; ideally, the income of both spouses
should be equal on retirement to minimize family tax;
- when funds are limited,
maximize the RRSP contributions of the higher income spouse before making any
contributions by the lower income spouse to maximize the tax benefit; the
contributions may be to a spousal plan for the benefit of the lower income
spouse;
- when faced with the choice
of whether to contribute to a RRSP or to pay down the home mortgage, consider
doing both by contributing to the RRSP and using the tax savings to pay down the
home mortgage;
- make contributions early in
the year rather than at the last minute to increase income tax sheltering and
increase retirement income;
- when funds are limited,
make contributions at the last minute to avoid non-deductible financing costs;
consider borrowing to contribute, as a rule of thumb, only if the loan can be
repaid within the next ten to twelve months;
- pay administrative fees
outside the RRSP, even though they are non-deductible, to maximize tax sheltered
retirement funds;
- contribute a retiring
allowance within allowable limits to a RRSP even if it may be necessary to draw
on the funds later;
- track undeducted RRSP
contributions carefully to avoid penalties on excessive
over-contributions;
- plan for next year's RRSP
contribution this year by insuring that you have sufficient earned income to
make the contribution that you wish;
- consider the RRSP maturity
options well in advance to avoid missing out on opportunities;
- attempt to withdraw funds
from RRSPs only when income - and marginal tax rates - are very low to minimize
tax on the withdrawal; plan for any additional tax due on withdrawal in excess
of the amount withheld at source;
- avoid withdrawing funds
from an RRSP or RRIF any sooner than necessary to maximize the benefits of tax
sheltering.
Conclusion
I hope that my
comments will prove useful to you in your personal financial and tax planning.
As I mentioned at the beginning, tax planning should be taken in context, as an
integral part of your planning to reach your personal and financial goals. When
we see how much we pay in taxes of one type or another, it is too easy to look
on tax in isolation, and on tax saving as an end in itself. Hopefully, the
information and ideas presented here will help you achieve broader and more
important goals.
Caution
Many of the thoughts expressed here have been described
in somewhat simplified terms. The actual rules can be very complex. You should
also be aware that tax rules have an annoying habit of changing. Last year's
great tax planning idea may be this year's tax trap. Please call me if you wish
to pursue any of these ideas so that we can review together your particular
circumstances.
|